From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 2 11:12:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA03167 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 11:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (mexico.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA03143 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 11:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id UAA09504 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 20:12:12 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.4/8.6.12) with UUCP id UAA09124 for hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 20:11:41 +0200 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.5/keltia-uucp-2.9) id TAA22980; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 19:51:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19970602195155.32703@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 19:51:55 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why routed and not gated by default? References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.67 In-Reply-To: ; from Brandon Gillespie on Mon, Jun 02, 1997 at 10:13:57AM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#3332 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Brandon Gillespie: > Just curious, why do we still have the antiquated routed as our default > router daemon? It only does RIP doesn't it? My general and limited If you've been following current, you know that the current routed is not the original one. It has been rewritten/enhanced by Vernon Schryver from SGI and now support more protocols like Router Discovery and RIPv2. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: There are no limits -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #10: Fri May 23 22:47:39 CEST 1997