From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 21:53:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369E2BEEE69 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DAB07BD95 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93A6A2828; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:53:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:53:06 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Per olof Ljungmark Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:53:09 -0000 On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to say > that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would miss > it if it went. Are there actually plans to retire it? To reiterate the status: * some extensive changes to the ports framework are coming; * these will require large changes to all the port upgrade tools; * no one has stepped forwards to offer to do the work for anything other than poudriere AFAIK. If no one does the work, at the time the large changes come, the other tools will break. People have been wanting subpackages (aka flavors) for many years; IIUC these are parts of the changes that are coming. Someone needs to step forwards and say "yes, I will do the work." mcl