From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 21:11:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46B02E8; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0.glenbarber.us (mail0.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1:2300:1001:1001:1001:face]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97857139E; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (c-71-224-221-174.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by mail0.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A4697D9C; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:11:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail0.glenbarber.us 5A4697D9C Authentication-Results: mail0.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:11:21 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Kenneth Culver Subject: Re: Java problems in stable Message-ID: <20140102211121.GA72258@glenbarber.us> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qrotSzihSRAsrOtf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:11:24 -0000 --qrotSzihSRAsrOtf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:07:02PM -0500, Kenneth Culver wrote: > Maybe this is the wrong list, so please send me the right direction if so, > but I recall a recent change in stable causing some Java issues (and the Which stable? > port is currently marked as forbidden). Was this something that was going > to be fixed before 10.0 releases? >=20 Yes. Glen --qrotSzihSRAsrOtf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSxdX5AAoJELls3eqvi17Q4KwP/AwR6boVwDZOdBX4ek+AtKc1 xgwvExKq6H3JlSrjd3tHe/CxRSQByE5tvg/bgtE3/T+/Se9NiHUCibdnK9nP1cZd fIA+z60jV4OwI1D25oyFQdfIXEkUBsN7vNueEESl6cDli5x6/geSj2W+BBcytnOQ 4CdqDRhSRnoUmkQm6Jwuy2jKb5vhf8CbFqLO9gaU6lCPKUeFPEry8P7kWLkz7Hrm iRzAgL1eFBWZ3kyuKDmkJbOwwGZzc4OPMCdBZ5oBqVT5J/eshWfBUDRhdy0tM2a5 eTAF/DxqIFdkdF9KPlUZaQt9q8imQXXfEIAiZI/sTUUhMRF09aE1mYiHN2jpFJNC EifGu2o5oZWXuVN1fj4CZOZlnbrApVBrdfqVMgMeaK62xaNZh1z7XMihUOO13wCD mwKJ1MeuOd+ItHD0uoiYNoTxx8lVs8iwpW51/F0a3xXrXVHW3wMUHbPd3x2rbWN5 ygBFoX+7cKUqBPN2BYmOEKM6tDItEcrUCuXbqVor4Ab3/zCz6OjFPL6c8wpmxRrX 5khVWZcy5YS7WM0TLbgMHe7FELfHd/Ht7bcQgMQnvMr8KQFTjeYqaMfaY0ufnQhs cRLqIMdYc/XpAlsK4UMZfRCSABNU4PhkN6U11r4vinYnz54aq3K4+db4nu7uzyps 1Sj15v4vaqfQhBDZZH39 =lqLC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qrotSzihSRAsrOtf--