Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Mar 95 18:38:34 MST
From:      terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
To:        faulkner@mpd.tandem.com (Boyd Faulkner)
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: BSD Consortium
Message-ID:  <9503140138.AA05524@cs.weber.edu>
In-Reply-To: <9503132212.AA01770@olympus> from "Boyd Faulkner" at Mar 13, 95 04:12:59 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Does anyone know if the NetBSD people are interested in a consortium?
> If not, the appeal is lessened... for me at least.

The initial list of goals I put up shouldn't step on any directional
toes, specifically to avoid any conflict between FreeBSD, NetBSD, or
BSDI (or anyone else who would be interested).

The one design issue, the "hardware scholarship", is equally usable
by all three parties, since it doesn't mandate a source base that
must be used to participate.

I do, however, think that instead of just me throwing out ideas off
the top of my head, a bit more participation is required at least
by members of both core teams and (hopefully) BSDI to get something
that is agreeably shaped.

Assuming a representative presence on steering committies for choice
of supported efforts, this shouldn't result in anyone being frozen
out.

Even the potential signing of non-disclosure and provision of binary
only Adaptec 2xxx drivers (one of my examples -- not necessarily a
suggested project) by the consortium to all groups would be welcome,
I'm sure.

I'm positive that NetBSD and BSDI have some cross-platform agendas
that they'd like to see support for that FreeBSD could (currently)
care less about, and vice versa.

Perhaps the best place to discuss this would be as a cross-posting in
the news groups?


The last I heard, Jordan was looking into the legal stuff... any
status on that?

There was also that kind offer by a rather international lawyer of
which we might try to avail ourselves.


What is probably needed now is a stake in the ground and a statement
of common goals that are to be coded into the bylaws in the articles
of incorporation.

I would definitely say that it wants to be a non-profit corp. to
confer tax exempt status for itself and tax deductable status for
contributions (at least in the US).

Any ideas regarding status in other countries, and whether or not
articles of incorporation need to be filed there as well?

What did the X consortium do?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9503140138.AA05524>