From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 19 17:37:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEB716A4CE; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:37:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pit.databus.com (p70-227.acedsl.com [66.114.70.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982EF43D39; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:37:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: from pit.databus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pit.databus.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7JHb9Nj034477; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:37:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by pit.databus.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i7JHb9VX034476; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:37:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:37:09 -0400 From: Barney Wolff To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20040819173708.GA33886@pit.databus.com> References: <20040819154334.GA23926@pit.databus.com> <20040819161315.GB29937@pit.databus.com> <4124D2F0.8050000@theatre.msu.edu> <200408191252.30593.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408191252.30593.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RELENG_5 kernel b0rken with IPFIREWALL and without PFIL_HOOKS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:37:10 -0000 On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:52:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > it is failing because the net.inet.ip.fw.enable sysctl was removed. the > > script needs to be updated to rely on one of the still existing sysctls. > > as of right now, with no edits, the script cannot complete succesfully > > unless ipfw is left as a module. No doubt this will be fixed shortly. > > Does it work ok if you change it to be 'net.inet.ip.fw'? Yes. I appear to have tunnel vision, not seeing the line above the one I was looking at. Thanks, Barney