From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Apr 3 22: 0: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3113E37B41B for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:00:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g34602210908; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:00:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200204040600.g34602210908@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jos Backus Subject: Re: ports/36707: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] net/rsync: avoid malloc.h warnings on -stable Reply-To: Jos Backus Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/36707; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jos Backus To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/36707: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] net/rsync: avoid malloc.h warnings on -stable Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:59:11 -0800 > >Description: > > on -stable rsync uses malloc.h which generates a lot of warnings. This > update avoids these warnings by using stdlib.h instead. Rather than patching N ports, why don't we simply remove /usr/{src/,}include/malloc.h so that configure no longer finds it, and patch ports that do use it to use instead? -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Santa Clara, CA _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ josb@cncdsl.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message