From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 12 21:57:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC38916A429; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C8743D48; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9CLtlnx061422; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:55:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:56:55 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20051012.155655.133432645.imp@bsdimp.com> To: ru@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20051012192254.GE75270@ip.net.ua> References: <200510121009.j9CA9aE3026075@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051012171227.GZ45070@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20051012192254.GE75270@ip.net.ua> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:55:48 -0600 (MDT) Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, jeremie@le-hen.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make make.1 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:57:30 -0000 In message: <20051012192254.GE75270@ip.net.ua> Ruslan Ermilov writes: : On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 07:12:27PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: : > Hi, : > : > > Modified files: : > > usr.bin/make make.1 : > > Log: : > > __MAKE_CONF doesn't really belong here because it is : > > a FreeBSD extension of sys.mk. A xref to make.conf(5) : > > will be enough here. : > : > BTW, why is it named __MAKE_CONF and not MAKE_CONF ? Is it something : > like scaring the user of using this it ? : > : To not pollute the namespace, I think. Yes. That's why I named it the way I did. Speaking of which, since I implemented it, why are people arguing with me about having a one liner in make(1)? It is really annoying me that maybe I'd have some perspective that would be relevant. Warner