Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:14:37 +0200 From: Michal Varga <varga.michal@gmail.com> To: Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@yandex.ru> Cc: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity? Message-ID: <1318349677.13444.34.camel@xenon> In-Reply-To: <324771318336324@web137.yandex.ru> References: <1318172010503-4885362.post@n5.nabble.com> <4E91E1A5.2020809@gmail.com> <1318185045153-4885908.post@n5.nabble.com> <324771318336324@web137.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 16:32 +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 09.10.2011, 22:30, "Jakub Lach": > > Speaking of lightness, XFCE is memory hungry > > these days and Linux centric, and Fluxbox is > > not that light after all. > > Are you saying that Fluxbox is heavier than KDE3?? > > Especially when Fluxbox is a window manager and KDE is an desktop environment. Comparing those two on the same scale is like comparing FreeBSD to an ssh client. m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1318349677.13444.34.camel>