Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:50:18 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: bernadette <bernadette.chirac@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: static route Message-ID: <44odm94gd1.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <74c646cd0703290849s55874ea3gca8c29c0b7243c2c@mail.gmail.com> (bernadette's message of "Thu\, 29 Mar 2007 17\:49\:57 %2B0200") References: <74c646cd0703290849s55874ea3gca8c29c0b7243c2c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
bernadette <bernadette.chirac@gmail.com> writes: > Is it possible to setup a static route while the "routes not in table > but not freed" (obtained doing netstat -rs) value is not to 0 ? Yes. > By the way what does mean "routes not in table but not freed" ? (If I > knew how to make one, I would have done this test myself of course) Offhand, I don't see any way to do it intentionally. It's just a reference-count failure.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44odm94gd1.fsf>