From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 7 16:04:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B115A16A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 16:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail2.firewall.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [192.11.222.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500F843D41 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 16:04:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shawnlkennedy@lucent.com) Received: from ihmail.ih.lucent.com (h135-1-218-70.lucent.com [135.1.218.70]) ESMTP id i37N3bB07545 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 18:03:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from il0015shawnlke2 (il0015shawnlke2.ih.lucent.com [135.185.54.213]) by ihmail.ih.lucent.com (8.11.7+Sun/EMS-1.5 sol2) id i37N3bC15392; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 18:03:37 -0500 (CDT) From: "Shawn Kennedy" To: Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 18:03:36 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <4074798B.1060100@math.missouri.edu> Subject: RE: Help with CTM X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: shawnlkennedy@lucent.com List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 23:04:28 -0000 One more thing - I assume it's OK to delete /usr/src as well when I upgrade via src-4? I'm currently running 4.9-STABLE. That one I am hesitant on! Shawn > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith [mailto:stephen@math.missouri.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:59 PM > To: shawnlkennedy@lucent.com > Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Help with CTM > > > I also found the man pages and FreeBSD docs on CTM to be misleading. > > You need to blow /usr/ports away first. The .ctm_status file didn't exist > message is to be expected for the reasons you state.