From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 16:54:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id E2EB816A4CF; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:54:16 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:54:16 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20050310165416.GC34206@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050305043006.GN83265@afflictions.org> <20050308060910.GA32871@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050308163601.GD48072@hub.freebsd.org> <86ekentvv4.fsf@xps.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86ekentvv4.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Kris Kennaway cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is -O2 supported for world? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:54:17 -0000 On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:32:15PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: > > No, it's worse than that. They cannot be compiled with ANY flags when > > *world* is built with -O2. They crash when trying to run binaries > > during the build, because of something going wrong in strtol() or > > similar (it's been ~4 months so my memory is fuzzy on the details but > > they've been pointed out to you several times). > > Funny, it just finished building here with no error. OK, but it's still been broken on the package cluster each time I've tested it. If you're interested in finding the problem and fixing it I can run another test. Kris