From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 21:16:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C2CFCF; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2038FC12; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pakbsde14.localnet (unknown [38.105.238.108]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 138E8B939; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:16:57 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Bruce Evans Subject: Re: svn commit: r244112 - head/sys/kern Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:39:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p22; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201212110708.qBB78EWx025288@svn.freebsd.org> <50CBC285.7060307@mu.org> <20121215161414.V1029@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20121215161414.V1029@besplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212171439.27297.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:16:57 -0500 (EST) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:27:35 +0000 Cc: Adrian Chadd , Alfred Perlstein , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein , Andriy Gapon , Gleb Smirnoff , Robert Watson , Navdeep Parhar , svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:16:57 -0000 On Saturday, December 15, 2012 1:04:17 am Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > On 12/14/12 4:12 PM, Robert Watson wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >>> On Thursday, December 13, 2012 4:02:15 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:53:48PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: A> The > >>>> problem again is that not all the KASSERTS are inviolable, if you A> want > >>>> to do a project to split them, then please do, it would really be A> > >>>> helpful, as for now, they are a mis-mash of death/warnings and there are > >>>> A> at least three vendors who approve of this as well as 3 long term A> > >>>> committers that approved my change (not including Adrian). > >>>> > >>>> Can you show examples of not inviolable KASSERTs? > >>> > >>> There are none. They are all assertions for a reason. However, in my > > Not even one whose existence is a bug? :-) They should just not exist at all then. :) All the more reason for them to panic early and often so developers will be prompted to remove them. -- John Baldwin