From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 7 17:24:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0332F16A41C for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:24:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DE643D53 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with SMTP id j67HOjlp013289; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:24:45 +0300 Received: from beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j67HOjPG002830; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:24:45 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id j67HOjWT002829; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:24:45 +0300 (EEST) X-Authentication-Warning: beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv: keramida set sender to keramida@ceid.upatras.gr using -f Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:24:45 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Matt Juszczak Message-ID: <20050707172445.GA2797@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20050707114448.O3620@neptune.atopia.net> <20050707164142.GA1503@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050707131739.M5573@neptune.atopia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050707131739.M5573@neptune.atopia.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procmail kill problems in dmesg? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:24:50 -0000 On 2005-07-07 13:20, Matt Juszczak wrote: > >Signal 11 is a segmentation fault. This _might_ be an indication of > >hardware/memory problems. > > Actually all the seg faults signal 11 happened at one time (within 20 > seconds), after checking messages .... it hasn't happened since. > > Could it have been a fluke? Do the segfaults only happen when you run procmail? If other programs fail randomly with segfaults, then it's more likely to be a general memory-hardware problem. If it's only procmail that fails it could be just a procmail bug.