From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Feb  1 11:21:36 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA18777
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 1 Feb 1998 11:21:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from mail.scsn.net (scsn.net [206.25.246.12])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA18725
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 1 Feb 1998 11:21:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from dmaddox@scsn.net)
Received: from rhiannon.scsn.net ([208.133.153.64]) by mail.scsn.net
          (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c)
          ID# 0-41950U6000L1100S0) with ESMTP id AAA174;
          Sun, 1 Feb 1998 14:18:36 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by rhiannon.scsn.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) id OAA02443;
	Sun, 1 Feb 1998 14:20:20 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from root)
Message-ID: <19980201142020.50990@scsn.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 14:20:20 -0500
From: dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. Maddox)
To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Can't get Linux-gdb (from ports collection) to work
Reply-To: dmaddox@scsn.net
Mail-Followup-To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org>,
	hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <19980201093839.06233@scsn.net> <199802011510.BAA00421@word.smith.net.au> <19980201102721.01931@scsn.net> <34D4A2C7.2781E494@asme.org> <19980201120033.32850@scsn.net> <34D4C55C.15FB7483@asme.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i
In-Reply-To: <34D4C55C.15FB7483@asme.org>; from Pedro F. Giffuni on Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 01:56:28PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe hackers"

On Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 01:56:28PM -0500, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Donald J. Maddox wrote:
> > 
> > Hmmm...  I assumed that the Linux assembler was producing bogus output
> > because of some bug in the emulation.  It never occurred to me that the
> > linux-devel port just contains outdated tools.
> >
> Well if the emulator doesn't scream, I guess we'll have to give the
> emulator the benefit of doubt. In any case, it's a good idea to have the
> tools independent from the emulation.

Maybe.  I'll reserve judgement until Eric updates the linux_devel port
to include up-to-date tools...  I am in the process right now of fetching
the files for crosssco, so hopefully that will fix my immediate problem.

Thanks...