Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:49:54 +0900 (JST) From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: freebsd@chillt.de Cc: aturetta@commit.it, openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] openoffice.org-2.0 fails to compile on 6-STABLE Message-ID: <20061025.094954.59723350.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20061025.083752.78774880.chat95@mac.com> References: <453DFF9A.1050702@commit.it> <453E0E13.4070106@chillt.de> <20061025.083752.78774880.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] openoffice.org-2.0 fails to compile on 6-STABLE Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:37:52 +0900 (JST) > From: Bartosz Fabianowski <freebsd@chillt.de> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] openoffice.org-2.0 fails to compile on 6-STABLE > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:58:59 +0100 > > > > The problem started, I think, with the 20061013 update of the gcc-4.1.x > > > port, which is only required when you compile for AMD64. > > > > I am on i386 but because I prefer gcj over Java, my build is also using > > the gcc 4.1 port. This would explain while most other people don't run > > into the problem. > > A good catch! Unfortunately, kris said that no amd64 machine can build > ooo at the moment, thus it does not affect for 6.2-RELEASE. But of course must be fixed ... -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061025.094954.59723350.chat95>