From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 19 02:56:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FBD16A4CE for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 02:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D87643D46 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 02:55:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i3J9rN2Q030434 for current@freebsd.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:53:23 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (hi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.94]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i3J9qv1c030198; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:52:57 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <4083A1A0.3070301@cronyx.ru> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:53:36 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <20040417035758.GA66806@kate.fud.org.nz> <20040417084217.GF46266@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040417084217.GF46266@cell.sick.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ported NetBSD if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:56:00 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 12:10:44AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >J> Do we need THREE bridging systems? >J> If you need features you culd probably add them pretty easily to one or >J> the other of the existing bridging modules.. > > Why having three alternatives is bad? We do have ipfw/ipf/pf and everyone >is happy. We do have ppp/pppd/ng_ppp (the latter is useless without mpd) and > > You've forgotten about sppp/ng_sppp (for sync adapters) :-) rik >many people use all of them. > The above question is not about bridges, but it is more general. > > >