From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 20:49:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF7416A4E6 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F31843D5F for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:49:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059F8170C5; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:49:43 +0000 (UTC) To: Eric Anderson From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:46:23 EST." <44EB6D1F.90104@centtech.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:49:43 +0000 Message-ID: <60853.1156279783@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: retasting devices on demand X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:49:48 -0000 In message <44EB6D1F.90104@centtech.com>, Eric Anderson writes: >Even so, a retaste function that worked on existing disks (like I had) >would be useful and an obvious command for admin-types. Would you be >opposed to such a command? As I said: the problem is that if part of the disk is open it will not work. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.