From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Apr 9 21:14:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pinky.plambert.net (pinky.plambert.net [205.219.88.225]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC08D37B828 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:14:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from plambert@pinky.plambert.net) Received: (from plambert@localhost) by pinky.plambert.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA83157 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:14:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from plambert) Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:14:29 -0700 From: "Paul M . Lambert" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: natd and two _external_ interfaces... Message-ID: <20000409211429.A19274@pinky.plambert.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm trying to run vmware on a box with two ethernet cards. Because the vmware port is not quite complete, i.e. it provides a 'fake' interface without any real bridging, I'm forced to use natd. I've got a box with 4.x-CURRENT, updated 1-2 weeks ago, and three interfaces total: de0 de1 vmnet1 I'd like to have one of two situations: 1) preferrable: all traffic from vmnet1 gets NAT-translated to either the de0 address or de1 address depending on its destination and the normal routing tables... 2) acceptable: all traffic from vmnet1 gets NAT-translated to the de1 address and goes out through that interface. I'm really not sure how to do this. Essentially, I'd like to have a nice, friendly, happy way to get this vmware box on the network, and I can't quite get it to work. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! --plambert -- I hate bombs, terrorism, fear, plans, future and past injustices, manifestos, popular sentiment, ignition, timetables, meetings, and poorly adjusted weasels. A warm hello to my friends and fans in domestic surveillance! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message