From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 16 23:20:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF89016A420 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:20:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D625C43D77 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:20:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 81680 invoked by uid 399); 16 Dec 2005 23:20:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Dec 2005 23:20:43 -0000 Message-ID: <43A34BC8.5040501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:20:40 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Emanuel Haupt References: <200512161940.jBGJePUr095410@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200512161940.jBGJePUr095410@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/deep_zoom Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:20:59 -0000 Emanuel Haupt wrote: > ehaupt 2005-12-16 19:40:25 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > graphics/deep_zoom Makefile > Log: > Mark ask DEPRECATED, distfile is unfetchable since 2004 and no longer > maintained by the author. > > PR: 90511 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=90511 > Submitted by: Jean Milanez Melo > > Revision Changes Path > 1.11 +4 -1 ports/graphics/deep_zoom/Makefile > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/deep_zoom/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.10&r2=1.11&f=h IMO, this is what should have been done with all ports in the "can't fetch since 2004" category that have no outstanding PRs against them. With the current size of the ports collection I think that we should be looking for every valid reason to delete ports that our users do not seem to have expressed any interest in. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection