From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 19:19:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C677C16A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:19:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from spam2.snu.ac.kr (spam2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.10.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1941143D39 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:19:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nospam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: (snipe 16250 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2004 03:19:32 +0900(KST) Received: from nospam@users.sourceforge.net with SpamSniper2.76 (Processed in 0.028121 secs); Received: from unknown (HELO sis1.snu.ac.kr) (147.46.10.36) by 0 with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 03:19:32 +0900(KST) X-RCPTTO: ahze@ahze.net,stephen@math.missouri.edu,ports@freebsd.org, Received: from users.sourceforge.net (cisr.snu.ac.kr [147.46.44.181]) by sis1.snu.ac.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2G3FqLJ077564; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:15:52 +0900 Message-ID: <40567245.8090605@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:19:33 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040315 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org References: <40565F3D.6010603@snu.ac.kr> <40566B4C.90009@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <40566B4C.90009@math.missouri.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ahze@ahze.net cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: grace-5.1.14_ - clash between hdf and netcdf X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:19:37 -0000 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > I remember having a similar problem with science/vis5d+. I think that > there is another port that also loads include and/or library files with > the same names as the netcdf files. I don't remember offhand which port > that was. I found that a solution was to delete the netcdf port, and > then reinstall it. Yes, indeed, very good point. I found an overlap and apparent clash between hdf and netcdf: $ pkg_info -W /usr/local/include/netcdf.h $ pkg_info: both hdf-4.1r5 and netcdf-3.5.0 claim to have installed /usr/local/include/netcdf.h $ pkg_info -W /usr/local/include/netcdf.inc $ pkg_info: both hdf-4.1r5 and netcdf-3.5.0 claim to have installed /usr/local/include/netcdf.inc $ pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/ncdump $ pkg_info: both hdf-4.1r5 and netcdf-3.5.0 claim to have installed /usr/local/bin/ncdump $ pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/ncgen $ pkg_info: both hdf-4.1r5 and netcdf-3.5.0 claim to have installed /usr/local/bin/ncgen Any ideas how to deal with these two conflicting ports? Regards, Rob.