From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 19 23: 1:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD9737B416 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:01:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 6322 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2002 07:01:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO helios.dub.net) ([216.27.176.75]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Jan 2002 07:01:51 -0000 Received: by helios.dub.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF1AD312A; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:01:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:01:50 -0800 From: Jim Mock To: Glenn Johnson Cc: FreeBSD-Ports Subject: Re: aspell or ispell Message-ID: <20020120070150.GB11166@helios.dub.net> Reply-To: mij@soupnazi.org References: <20020120045529.GA84255@gforce.johnson.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020120045529.GA84255@gforce.johnson.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 at 22:55:29 -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote: > I am working on a port that can use either aspell or ispell. Is there > a preference for either of those spell check programs to be used as a > dependency for ports? I'd go for ispell, personally. It has less (rather, no) dependencies. - jim -- jim mock http://soupnazi.org/ | jim@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message