Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 20:01:26 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Not much reason to have */R-cran-* ports Message-ID: <20180320190126.GV21001@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <5AB15109.8010703@grosbein.net> References: <791f8a7f-7f3e-2070-0be3-50494b1b2801@rawbw.com> <5AB15109.8010703@grosbein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Eugene wrote: > It is a bit funny you are bothered on 250 R-cran-* ports when we > have 1908 p5-* ports, 964 py-* ports, 600 rubygem-* ports and > 280 hs-* ports in the single ports/devel category. This is an important point. Every toolchain does its own dependency tracking etc. So maybe it's time to get those folks together and discuss a common subset so that systems can maintain that and not 5-10 seperate systems. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 2 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180320190126.GV21001>