From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 20 8:40:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4B137B8A5 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 08:40:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13B1123D1; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:40:16 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <38D494A5.FE9796CD@nasby.net> References: <38D48D3D.1DBA8F5D@nasby.net> <38D494A5.FE9796CD@nasby.net> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 16:24:18 +0100 To: "Jim C. Nasby" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: 3.4-4.0 and vinum Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 2:49 AM -0600 2000/3/19, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Also, sorry for cross-posting my previous message to -questions as well > as -stable, but I wanted to warn anyone who might be running vinum about > this... would be a major pain if this happened on a production box. Of course, you shouldn't be trying to use 4.0 on a production box. ;-) It's at the "Hey guys, take a look at this thing that is hot out of alpha test" stage right now, and there's going to be a lot of teething problems before things settle down. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message