From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Dec 9 8: 4:41 2000 From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 9 08:04:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (berserker.twistedbit.com [199.79.183.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A99F37B400 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 08:04:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (cp@localhost.bsdi.com [127.0.0.1]) by berserker.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eB9G4UH06285; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 09:04:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from cp@berserker.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200012091604.eB9G4UH06285@berserker.bsdi.com> To: Terry Lambert Cc: adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org, eischen@vigrid.com, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Userland atomic assignments In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 09 Dec 2000 06:55:27 GMT." <200012090655.XAA08475@usr08.primenet.com> From: Chuck Paterson Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 09:04:30 -0700 Sender: cp@berserker.bsdi.com Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org }The preemption-safe reader-writer locks seem to be excellent, }and just what the doctor ordered for Julian's work on netgraph... } } } Terry Lambert } terry@lambert.org Terry, I'm having trouble finding the example which doesn't use lock operations which is what we were trying to avoid. Could you put a more exact reference. Thanks Chuck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message