From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  9 11:37:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7930416A4CE; Fri,  9 Jan 2004 11:37:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9B4F843D66; Fri,  9 Jan 2004 11:37:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Received: from news1.macomnet.ru (dhy4ntaf@news1.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.14])
	by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i09Jb87j220160;
	Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:37:08 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:37:08 +0300 (MSK)
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <3FFF027C.A6900160@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040109223638.R53481@news1.macomnet.ru>
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040109113607.63053B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
 <20040109215449.J19580@news1.macomnet.ru> <3FFF027C.A6900160@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: the TCP MSS resource exhaustion commit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:37:20 -0000

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, 20:35+0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:

> Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, 11:39-0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I guess my basic worry in this conversation is that fundamentally, the
> > > rate detection and "stop" approach is based on a common case heuristic:
> > > "Most well behaved applications don't...".  Unfortunately, I have the
> > > feeling we're going to run into a lot of exceptions, and while we can
> > > improve the heuristic, I can't help but wonder if we shouldn't disable the
> > > heuristic by default, and provide better reporting so that sites can tell
> >
> > Seconded.  It will be a major PITA if we ship 5.2-R with "broken"
> > TCP/IP.
>
> I committed it with default to off for 5.2-R (the disconnect part).

Great, thanks!

-- 
Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org