Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:51:43 -0700
From:      "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
To:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: Re[2]: IE in FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEGLFCAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050921133920.3413.GERARD@seibercom.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gerard Seibert
>Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 10:46 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re[2]: IE in FreeBSD?
>

> Lets be fair here. A multitude of companies are out sourceing. IBM, =
Dell,
> etc. are all out sourceing. I have spend days tying to get a
> tech-support individual that can speak fluent English.

> If the criteria for using a product is whether its producer is =
entirely
> based in and uses only American products and labor, then the pool of
> available products is going to be extremely small.

You missed the point.  American recruiting firms get money for finding =
people
to fill positions in America.  They do not (with rare exceptions) get =
money
for finding people to fill positions in India or China.

Microsoft (according to the article) is actively outsourcing to those =
locations.
Thus their new positions they want people for are not going to be filled =
by
American search firms (with rare exceptions)  They are going to be =
filled
by Chinese and Indian search firms.

It is illogical for an American search firm to be sending money to a =
company
that is actively working to NOT have to ever need their services.  Every =
dollar
that an American search firm spends on a Microsoft product simply helps=20
Microsoft to dry up the pool of positions and send them overseas that =
much
faster.  In short, the search firms are helping to fund their own =
demise.

The situation is analogous to General Motors buying a bunch of Ford cars
for their fleet sales reps. to use to drive around to their accounts, =
because
the person at GM doing the purchase finds that the Ford cars are easier
to drive.  Do you get it now?

Ted




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEGLFCAA.tedm>