From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 21:57:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4167F16A420; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from speedfactory.net (mail6.speedfactory.net [66.23.216.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E2913C483; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (unverified [66.23.211.162]) by speedfactory.net (SurgeMail 3.8k2) with ESMTP id 205677843-1834499 for multiple; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:57:29 -0400 Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7RLv8RP030598; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:57:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Daniel Eischen Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:57:00 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200708270850.20904.jhb@freebsd.org> <200708271715.21462.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708271757.01674.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:57:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/4078/Mon Aug 27 16:37:54 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, peterjeremy@optushome.com.au, alfred@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" , yar@comp.chem.msu.su Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:57:13 -0000 On Monday 27 August 2007 05:38:08 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Monday 27 August 2007 04:55:31 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: > >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, M. Warner Losh wrote: > >> > >>> In message: <200708271529.42264.jhb@freebsd.org> > >>> John Baldwin writes: > >>> : And yes, I do think it's ok for -current to have rougher edges. After > > all, we > >>> : aren't really trying to get people running -current on production > > systems. > >>> > >>> I think it is OK for -current to have rougher edges. I don't think it > >>> is OK to require -current to have rougher edges. > >> > >> I think we can agree on that! I also think there is some confusion > >> over whether adding ABI changes to an existing symbol version would > >> force us to rebuild ports. It doesn't. Once symbol versioning is > >> released in 7.0, we can create a new version (FBSD_1.1, or add to > >> the existing FBSD_1.1 depending on how the FTS stuff goes) and add > >> all the (non-overlapping) ABI changes we want to it _without_ having > >> to rebuild ports. This is a tremendous advantage over -current as > >> it is today. > > > > So you want to just bump the version everytime a change happens in HEAD? > > No, I don't see how you get that from what I said... You originally objected to having fts compat symbols as 1.0 and wanted the new fts to be 1.0. Now you are saying that the new fts can be 1.1 and the old ones (only used in old current) can remain 1.0. That is, now you are saying to do what Yar originally wanted to do before you objected. -- John Baldwin