Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 12:04:08 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/6633 Message-ID: <585.895572248@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 May 1998 11:19:57 %2B0200." <199805190919.LAA21513@internal>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199805190919.LAA21513@internal>, Andre Albsmeier writes: >> Synopsis: buffer in sys/sys/msgbuf.h became rather small >> >> State-Changed-From-To: open-closed >> State-Changed-By: phk >> State-Changed-When: Tue May 19 02:00:44 PDT 1998 >> State-Changed-Why: >> I have made the size of the buiffer a normal kernel option in -current now. >> Due to some esoteric concerns about this buffer, it cannot be dynamically >> be resized. > >Hmm, does't dmesg need to know about the correct size as well? If yes, >how will it know about the value from the kernel option? It picks up the size from the kernel now. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?585.895572248>