From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 25 22:15:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F4316A4CE; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:15:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.nl (smtp5.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5172643D2D; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:15:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (p0320.nas1-asd6.dial.wanadoo.nl [62.234.209.66]) by smtp5.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 27F0B768A5; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:15:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:15:10 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Kirill Ponomarew Message-Id: <20040226071510.20bb6ca4.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <200402252239.i1PMdwqp078394@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200402252239.i1PMdwqp078394@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: krion@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/63362: Nuppelvideo only for i386 and amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:15:19 -0000 On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:39:58 -0800 (PST) Kirill Ponomarew wrote: KP> Synopsis: Nuppelvideo only for i386 and amd64 KP> KP> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed KP> State-Changed-By: krion KP> State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 25 14:39:09 PST 2004 KP> State-Changed-Why: KP> kris marked it already BROKEN on all ARCHs != i386 && != amd64 Yes I know, he sent me an FYI because I am maintainer of this port. I think ONLY_FOR_ARCHS is more appropriate because the reason it won't build is the presence of i386 assembler in the application. It isn't broken on other architectures it just assumes i386 assembler. BROKEN seems to me to carry an implication of being fixable, this requires more than a fix and I don't see it ever happening (the original author no longer responds to email). -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/