From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Mar 12 11:59:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB2B1543E for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 11:59:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id MAA17428; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 12:58:54 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990312125429.03fa6530@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 12:58:47 -0700 To: Terry Lambert , jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: O'Reilly article: Whence the Source: Untangling the Open Source/Free Software Debate Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199903121940.MAA23571@usr01.primenet.com> References: <4352.921186024@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry: Thank you for posting that. I've read all of Guy Kawasaki's books, and believe that FreeBSD can benefit from his hard-won experience in product promotion. Again, I think that having a small group of "FreeBSD Daemons" (I've got to give my wife credit for coming up with the name, as obvious as it seems once one hears it) is a good thing. A bit of highly (perhaps overly) enthusiastic evangelism is fine, so long as it's not the ONLY approach and is properly managed and balanced. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message