From owner-freebsd-security Thu Nov 11 15: 2:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from gatekeeper.veriohosting.com (gatekeeper.veriohosting.com [192.41.0.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681EB14E4A for ; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:02:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hart@iserver.com) Received: by gatekeeper.veriohosting.com; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:02:50 -0700 (MST) Received: from unknown(192.168.1.109) by gatekeeper.veriohosting.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001662; Thu, 11 Nov 99 16:02:21 -0700 Received: (hart@localhost) by anchovy.orem.iserver.com (8.9.3) id QAA09451; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:00:09 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:00:09 -0700 (MST) From: Paul Hart X-Sender: hart@anchovy.orem.iserver.com To: "Aaron D. Gifford" Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability In-Reply-To: <19991111213301.D44DE20F66@infowest.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Aaron D. Gifford wrote: > As was already mentioned in this thread, BIND's default installation > and startup location for the named.conf file is /etc/named.conf > while FreeBSD's is /etc/namedb/named.conf -- a quick symlink fixes > that too. Why don't we stop being the oddball and make the named that comes with FreeBSD use /etc/named.conf as its configuration file? Paul Hart -- Paul Robert Hart ><8> ><8> ><8> Verio Web Hosting, Inc. hart@iserver.com ><8> ><8> ><8> http://www.iserver.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message