From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 06:34:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBB416A404 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:34:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160DA13C484 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689311C809F; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:34:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28859-03; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:34:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (135.231.77.125.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [125.77.231.135]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F9E1C0019; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:34:35 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Weiwu To: james thompson In-Reply-To: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Real Softservice Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:30:23 +0800 Message-Id: <1177741823.28603.24.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, JamesThompson65@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:34:29 -0000 Dear James I am afraid the answer is no. FreeBSD is simple enough on its technical structural but not the kind of "simple" as to novice user (so the right question might be if FreeBSD is novice-user friendly enough or easy to learn enough). The OS best fitting your requirement could be Ubuntu Linux or SuSE, while both can run Office 98, but you probably need to buy and install a software called CrossOffice (around 65$) before you can run Office 98. However the OpenOffice office suit which by default installed in SuSE and Ubuntu is superior than Office 98 in functionality, and can open your old Office 98 documents just fine (except, if you are in China, the Chinese compatibility is not very good for both Office 98 and OpenOffice). If you install CrossOffice, Microsoft Publisher 2000 can run on it, but better check with CrossOffice sales people first, this company designed and sells CrossOffice: http://www.codeweavers.com The interface of Ubunti Linux is very easy to learn and is not very different from Windows. I myself use OpenOffice Draw for making publications. For me it's enough, however it lack the feature of template publications which Publisher offers, so if you think templates are very important (e.g. being able to use template to create a Christmas Card in minutes without having design knowledge like match color) then maybe you still need Publisher. I myself use OpenSuSE for desktop, making publication and doing spreadsheet for business, writing documents, contracts and invoices, using email etc. (Right now I am using it). I know many friends use Ubuntu that can do these things just fine. FreeBSD is used as server system here in my office. FreeBSD also can run a lot of desktop software but all through the years I generally see much more Linux users using desktop software. Best Regards On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 22:20 -0400, james thompson wrote: > How difficult is FreeBSD to use in place of MS windows, say compared to > Apple OSX? I believe it may be able to run Offide 98; can Office 98 > with Publisher be ran on FreeBSD? I want to use FreeBSD to compose > articles, and combine them into a Book for publication, as a Home Office > Operation by a person with little experience beyond windows. In 1995, > I took a MicroComputer Operating Systems course in Windows 3.11 and DOS > 6.22. I have used Windows 95, 98, and XP Home & upgraded to Media Edition.