From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 12:42:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B16A16A41F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apelisse@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C0A43D49 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:42:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apelisse@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l37so96828nfc for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 04:42:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=EMIOTvMHDP7l/NPNMRQc/DdE47j5z85/bzoeTS9UjfC+bNX4Qj8Hu/v07b0Sy65Uwe78VvyYSvgeEX8U8Sf72VImQdR5hPJ2zdPoaFn0xFFWAzMnp3yxzuY7l2eiKVlDrsgfOzJk+iT7Ynt1BIxsoMTIRcuLMjt+Rc6ctFu89Pg= Received: by 10.48.217.1 with SMTP id p1mr257559nfg; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 04:42:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.5.1 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 04:42:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <61c746830511210442y60b8ef96sd7e39ddc55edfbc6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:42:13 +0000 From: Antoine Pelisse To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <61c746830511210441r7aa60718vd97b84e585b6688b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000001c5ed5c$f8153240$0130a8c0@Gleb> <61c746830511210441r7aa60718vd97b84e585b6688b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: 6.0-release i386 sysctl panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:42:16 -0000 Hi, This is probably the same kind of panic that Don Lewis fixed lately in fill_kinfo_proc() and it should certainly be fixed the same way. We really can't release the lock in the loop and should look in the code fo= r other occurrences of this mistake as it's really likely that it will trigge= r other panics in the future. Regards, Antoine Pelisse