Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Oct 1995 00:05:30 -0700
From:      asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
To:        nate@rocky.sri.MT.net
Cc:        bde@zeta.org.au, davidg@Root.COM, phk@critter.tfs.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org, phk@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/i386/gen Makefile.inc divsi3.S fixdfsi.S fixunsdfsi.S udivsi3.S
Message-ID:  <199510060705.AAA05173@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <199510051630.KAA07433@rocky.sri.MT.net> (message from Nate Williams on Thu, 5 Oct 1995 10:30:34 -0600)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * > >The divsi3 stuff is inlined by gcc, and the fixdfsi stuff is in libgcc
 * > 
 * > Isn't there still a problem with functions from shared libs being linked
 * > to before static libraries?
 * 
 * Yes.  But it's actually being worked on. :)

You mean by gcc inserting a -Bstatic and -Bdynamic around -lgcc (or
something like that)?

Well that's fine for most programs, but some software (e.g., emacs)
explicitly puts -lgcc in there, for whatever reason.

Why are we still shipping libgcc.so.261.0 with the bindist anyway?
Now that "make world" doesn't make it, shouldn't that be part of
compat205dist?

Satoshi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510060705.AAA05173>