From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Oct 9 06:40:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA03494 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 06:40:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Radford.i-Plus.net (Radford.i-Plus.net [208.24.67.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA03451 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 06:40:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rewt@i-Plus.net) Received: from Radford.i-Plus.net (rewt@Radford.i-Plus.net [208.24.67.15]) by Radford.i-Plus.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA16841; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 09:40:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 09:40:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Troy Settle To: Graeme Tait cc: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How to share accounts between mail/pop and web servers? In-Reply-To: <361ADA58.58B7@webcom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Graeme Tait wrote: > Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > > > It's better to break out services to various servers, so that only > > one service may be down for the customer. If it's fixed quickly, they > > usually don't mind, but when "everything" is down for them. > > > I can see it cutting both ways. If you had say 5 boxes in my model > and one went down, 20% of users are affected. If all there email was > on one box in the alternate model, 100% of email is down. > > The model I suggested seems to be that successfully used by pair.com > (running FreeBSD, of course). I think we got into an "Apples vs. Oranges" discussion here. For a web hosting setup, splitting users is clearly an optimal choice. For an ISP, however, splitting services offers greater reliability and easier management. I, for one, would love to have a centralized authentication server. -- Troy Settle Network Administrator, iPlus Internet Services http://www.i-Plus.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message