From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 17:16:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A4F106564A for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo201.cox.net (eastrmfepo201.cox.net [68.230.241.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C328FC16 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo305.cox.net ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120124171645.IXKK4752.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo305.cox.net>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:16:45 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo305.cox.net with bizsmtp id RVGk1i0071BeFqy02VGkGz; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:16:44 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020B.4F1EE77C.0159,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=UTnd/fk6CCePovf+gzxRIqLTsJhlNaD/+XivpuoWZ3E= c=1 sm=1 a=EnZeqY4DioAA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=DDq7R-G38bBZdIXk5O0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0OHGhtJ035808; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:16:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:16:38 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20120124111638.0e6eeb09@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1EBE51.3050300@freebsd.org> <20120124091457.66d23583@cox.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:16:51 -0000 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier > wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:05 -0500 > > Michael Scheidell wrote: > >> > >> On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > >> > # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.20111108 > >> > > >> what happens with: > >> > >> # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 lang/gcc44 > >> > >> ? > > > > Well, since gcc44 is no longer installed, I just tried: > > > > portmaster -o lang/gcc47 lang/gcc46 > > > > And the actions that started were much more along the lines of what > > I was expecting. =A0The build of gcc47 is currently underway as I > > write this. > > > > So, it seems it's not a good idea to "mix and match" port origins > > with port names in the case of this particular option. =A0Could this > > be considered a "bug"? =A0It certainly seems to at least qualify as a > > "quirk", I would say. =A0:-) > > > > -- > > Conrad J. Sabatier > > conrads@cox.net >=20 > I wanted to note is that you installed lang/gcc46, the development > version of the compiler. It gets updated very frequently and you may > want this, but it is probably better for most people to install > lang/gcc which is the stable version of gcc-4.6. It gets updated only > when a new gcc-4.6 version is released, so it does not get updated > nearly so often. Posts that depend on USE_FORTRAN or USE_GCC=3D4.6+ will > both be happy with lang/gcc, though they will pull in the development > version if no gcc-4.6 is installed. Yes, I do recall now a lot of talk about 4.6 being subject to frequent change. Slipped my mind there for a bit. :-) I think I will back off to the other version. I mainly was interested in getting up to the minimum version needed to truly support my AMD Phenom 9550 processor (-march=3Damdfam10) the same way Clang does. Thanks for that info. --=20 Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net