Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:17:16 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r222980 - in head/sys: amd64/conf i386/conf Message-ID: <4DF3B12C.8020505@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106111403060.44950@fledge.watson.org> References: <201106110908.p5B98kkE066709@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106111403060.44950@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/11/2011 6:07 AM, Robert Watson wrote: > To me, this seems like the wrong direction. Over the last decade, we've > been trying to move away from conditional compilation of features to > having them be loadable as modules. FWIW, I agree. I'm wondering though, is there still a performance penalty for modules? My understanding in the past was that there is, although for most use cases it's in the statistical noise. Is that still true? Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DF3B12C.8020505>