From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 22 17:39:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2721116A40F for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E5F43D58 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:39:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9CB1A3C22; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:39:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 254C455421; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:39:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:39:44 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Albert Shih Message-ID: <20060422173943.GA13919@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060421195837.GB7214@math.jussieu.fr> <20060421221448.GA72601@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060422042115.GA16683@math.jussieu.fr> <20060422042810.GA77451@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060422074539.GA5033@math.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060422074539.GA5033@math.jussieu.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ruby don't compile after 5.2 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:39:51 -0000 --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 09:45:39AM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > Le 22/04/2006 00:28:10-0400, Kris Kennaway a =E9crit > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:21:15AM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > P.S. Why are you using an old version like 5.3 though? It's not > > > > recommended. > > >=20 > > > No I prefere make upgrade from 5.2.1 to 5.3 before 5.4, step by step > > > 5.2.1 --> 5.3 > > > 5.3 --> 5.4 > > > 5.4 --> 5.5 > > >=20 > > > ;-) > > >=20 > > > Thanks for your answer. > >=20 > > Well, if you're just trying to upgrade to 5.5, there's no need to > > upgrade all your ports in between, and you'll save a lot of time that > > way. Quickest of all is to do a binary upgrade direct to 5.5, of > > course. >=20 > That's strange.... >=20 > And it's true for 5.4 ? Because in this time I can't upgrade directly to > 5.5, it's virtual server running with vmware and I don't known if my > version of vmware can running a vm with 5.5 (But I known it's true with > 5.4). I'd be extremely surprised if you couldn't run 5.5 in vmware. Kris --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFESmpfWry0BWjoQKURAlMpAJ9mhWpnDLwr0H75s5UaxkYhCHZJJwCePSBQ GX/+QlJgfgMM4QzVLpL3IzE= =3y1Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--