From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Jul 10 21:41: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8E537BCA6 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:41:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@wantadilla.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by wantadilla.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA23554 for FreeBSD-smp@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:11:02 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from grog) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:11:02 +0930 From: Greg Lehey To: FreeBSD-smp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Decisions, decisions Message-ID: <20000711141102.F23115@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It seems that BSD/OS i386 and BSD/OS SPARC have chosen different names for the same function (intr_establish for i386, addintr for SPARC). Obviously I need to choose exactly one name. I'd like an opinion. For my way of thinking, addintr is closer to the terminology we use. The disadvantage is that the i386 code is riddled with intr_establishes, and this could confuse people importing code. Any thoughts? Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message