From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Mar 17 00:04:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA28048 for freebsd-doc-outgoing; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 00:04:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt050n33.san.rr.com (@dt050n33.san.rr.com [204.210.31.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA28043 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 00:04:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Received: from dal.net (Studded@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt050n33.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA14443; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 00:04:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Message-ID: <350E2E89.C9CA3B4F@dal.net> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 00:04:25 -0800 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-BETA-0316 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lehey CC: John Kenagy , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Docs Editor (Was: Re: Documentation plan?) References: <27422.890094715@time.cdrom.com> <19980317180815.17122@freebie.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Greg Lehey wrote: > Interesting idea. Yes, I think you're right. I'm prodding somebody > to volunteer, but won't mention names at this point. Failing an > editor, at least a system of reviewing would be a good idea. What do > other people think? I'd say if the project is serious about a doc overhaul, a unifying force is practically a necessity. Doug PS, I'm on the doc list now, no need to cc me. :) -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message