Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:34:52 +0200 From: Markus Brueffer <markus@freebsd.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/kdesvn/files patch-src-commandline_part.cpp patch-src-svnfrontend-importdir_logmsg.cpp patch-src-svnqt-dirent.cpp patch-src-svnqt-log_entry.cpp patch-src-svnqt-wc.cpp Message-ID: <200604290334.56328.markus@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060429041257.62034e70@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200604290013.k3T0Dgrs079866@repoman.freebsd.org> <200604290239.13455.markus@freebsd.org> <20060429041257.62034e70@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1937129.bMurj84ykB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Saturday 29 April 2006 03:12 schrieb Ion-Mihai Tetcu: > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 02:39:09 +0200 > > Markus Brueffer <markus@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Am Saturday 29 April 2006 02:21 schrieb Ion-Mihai Tetcu: > > > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:13:41 +0000 (UTC) > > > > > > Markus Brueffer <markus@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > markus 2006-04-29 00:13:41 UTC > > > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > > > Added files: > > > > devel/kdesvn/files patch-src-commandline_part.cpp > > > > patch-src-svnfrontend-importdir_logmsg.cpp > > > > patch-src-svnqt-dirent.cpp > > > > patch-src-svnqt-log_entry.cpp > > > > patch-src-svnqt-wc.cpp > > > > Log: > > > > Fix build on 4.x > > > > > > nice :) > > > > > > > Reported by: kris > > > > > > You could have trusted my tindy which was saying the same thing in > > > the same day you commited the port, y'know. > > > > Sorry, I forgot to credit you as well. I did (and still do :) ) trust > > your tinderbox and highly appreciate your feedback, > > As long as you trust sce-tindy all is good :) > > > but I didn't want to bother you for each and every patch I made to > > progress a bit futher in the build (now I got only 5 but who knows these > > days how many patches you will need with an ancient gcc?). > > I kinda' wonder if our time is best spent on making ports compile with > gcc 2.x It isn't a requirement anymore that ports build on 4.x but I for one hate=20 BROKEN lines in my ports, so I try to keep them building on 4.x if possible= =20 and as there are still some people out there that are using 4.x as a deskto= p=20 system I'm sure it's appreciated. As most of my ports are KDE related ones,= I=20 can't just use gcc 3.x but as most ports only require trivial patches this = is=20 ok. > > I didn't expect that it would take me so long to build an own stable > > tinderbox (see the last graid3 commit for the reason why). > > Yeh, I know about that problem from IRC; glad to know it's fixed. Absolutly. Kudos to pjd! =2D-=20 Markus Brueffer =A0 =A0| GPG-Key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~markus/markus.= asc markus@brueffer.de | FP: 3F9B EBE8 F290 E5CC 1447 8760 D48D 1072 78F8 A8D4 markus@FreeBSD.org | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! --nextPart1937129.bMurj84ykB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEUsLA1I0Qcnj4qNQRAjdqAJ0fymFz64wMCNxDHkr5VO1gxWRDxQCgzfof nJMqufX6Ypcxm1qLgTebFPU= =eNHI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1937129.bMurj84ykB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604290334.56328.markus>