Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:17:16 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD for serious performance? (was: Re: 9.x -- New Install -- serious partition misalignment) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212121317060.1751@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212082242200.1920@wonkity.com> References: <20121209014547.238070@gmx.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212082242200.1920@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> B. Use GPT, which does not have the CHS baggage. It is easier and more bsd labels doesn't have too > versatile. My systems with GPT disks don't complain about track > alignment. Or maybe that's ahci(4)'s doing. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1212121317060.1751>