From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 3 17:08:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCAA16A407; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@2hip.net) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD0713C44B; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@2hip.net) Received: from [63.251.67.21] (rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com [63.251.67.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l03GuvIV098199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:57:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@2hip.net) From: Robert Noland To: Mark Ovens In-Reply-To: <45966C26.8080602@freebsd.org> References: <45966C26.8080602@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:55:05 -0500 Message-Id: <1167843305.24262.2.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fixing broken dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:08:28 -0000 On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 13:39 +0000, Mark Ovens wrote: > I used pkg_delete(1) to remove several unwanted ports but now > portmanager reports them as missing because they are still listed as in > the +CONTENTS of other packages, e.g. I pkg_delete'd koffice but > portmanager now lists it as MISSING because it is still listed in the > +CONTENTS of the kde meta-port as a @pkgdep. > > What is the best way to fix this? If I run ``portmanager -u'' to upgrade > all the ports I suspect that it will simply reinstall all the ports it > considers are missing. > > I'm sure I know how to do this, but I can't remember :( If you delete the meta-port, portmanager will track the individual components separately and not complain about the missing deps. robert. > Thanks. > > Regards, > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"