From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 11:41:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0324916A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:41:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C324D43D1D for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:41:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i23JfD3D036316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:41:13 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i23JfCDS036315; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:41:12 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:41:12 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: fbsd_user Message-ID: <20040303194112.GA36064@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , fbsd_user , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040303172340.GC34093@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:41:28 -0000 --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:35:55PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote: > Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable > release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from > moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that > authorizes the movement of development branch versions to stable > branch? Just what is the time line for 4.x stable versions and the > 5.x development versions? Sure would like an idea of the future so I > can plan the upgrade time line for my environment. No, I'm not part of the "inner circle" that decides these things. All I'm doing is repeating stuff I've head on other mailing lists. As I understand it, at least one more release from the 4-STABLE branch is planned. That release will be numbered 4.10, and if it's going by anything like the usual schedule (ie. 3 releases per major branch per year) it will be the next release to be made, in a month or two's time. It could well be the last release made from the 4-STABLE branch, as it will probably be followed in about 3-4 months time by 5.3-RELEASE, and that is planned to coincide with the creation of 5-STABLE. Understand that this is all speculation on my part. Chapter and verse may be obtained here: http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html The RELENG_5 Schedule is here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap/schedule.= html but as you can see, things have slipped a bit, and it's unlikely that 5.3 will be released by the end of this month, especially considering how recently 5.2.1-RELEASE happened. Of course, this could all be complete twaddle. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFARjTYdtESqEQa7a0RAoafAJ44Y/OwD0aPJiJCo9DCxcQ/JHA44gCfZt4p NJNwRwdPE/lf2/RAggzwWR8= =PMEm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--