From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jul 17 21:42:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C4737BA9E; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:42:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA16262; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:42:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:42:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Steve Shah Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPsec performance (Re: Merge of KAME code) In-Reply-To: <20000716174745.A19964@clickarray.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Steve Shah wrote: > What was the speed of the processor that this test was run under? You apparently missed the original message, quoted below: ---- I used to benchmarked IPsec performance on following platform with netperf. - PentiumIII 500MHz - 256MB Memory - Intel Ether Express Pro 100 (100Mbps) - FreeBSD 2.2.8 - KAME 19990809 stable - connect two machines directly - IPv4 - IPsec transport mode - ESP with 3DES-CBC - AH with HMAC-SHA1 And the results are about, TCP STREAM TEST UDP STREAM TEST NONE: 60Mbps NONE: 94Mbps AH: 23Mbps AH: 30Mbps ESP: 11Mbps ESP: 11Mbps AH+ESP: 8Mbps AH+ESP: 9Mbps P.S. The same tests with IPv6 produced almost the same results. // ARIGA Seiji ---- Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message