From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Oct 2 12:31:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from kirk.giovannelli.it (kirk.giovannelli.it [194.184.65.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52BA1539E for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 12:30:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gmarco@giovannelli.it) Received: from suzy (modem10.masternet.it [194.184.65.20]) by kirk.giovannelli.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA19453 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 08:17:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gmarco@giovannelli.it) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19991002081851.01741530@194.184.65.4> X-Sender: gmarco@194.184.65.4 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Sat, 02 Oct 1999 08:21:34 +0200 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Gianmarco Giovannelli Subject: make clean in usr/ports Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I often make a make clean in the /usr/ports tree to clean what is remained from the previous installs. But it is so slow... So I tried a more brutal : rm -R */*/work and it is a flash ... Is there any drawback to use it instead of make clean ? Best Regards, Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday" http://www.giovannelli.it/~gmarco http://www2.masternet.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message