From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 10 11:23:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7125A16A41F for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:23:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from sm7.simplethings.de (a15160313.alturo-server.de [217.160.128.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119A043D5C for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:23:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from smm.simplethings.de ([85.88.4.201]) by sm7.simplethings.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1El2ou-0003vo-VI; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:23:23 +0100 Received: from [212.79.172.180] (helo=center.shared) by smM.simplethings.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1El2ou-0005D8-Lb; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:23:16 +0100 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=center.sz) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1El2pn-0005k7-2K; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:24:11 +0100 Received: from 192.168.0.5 (proxying for 81.173.177.37) (SquirrelMail authenticated user thelen); by vogon.ccgis.de with HTTP; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:24:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <39951.192.168.0.5.1134213851.squirrel@192.168.0.5> In-Reply-To: <200512091723.50440.ringworm01@gmail.com> References: <39809.192.168.0.5.1134159325.squirrel@192.168.0.5> <200512091230.25361.ringworm01@gmail.com> <39847.192.168.0.5.1134171372.squirrel@192.168.0.5> <200512091723.50440.ringworm01@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:24:11 +0100 (CET) From: "Benjamin Thelen" To: "Michael C. Shultz" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:23:26 -0000 > On Friday 09 December 2005 15:36, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> > On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> >> You FreeBSD guys, >> >> >> >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? >> Is >> >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list >> >> (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just >> stupid >> >> work arounds -sorry. >> >> >> >> I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from >> >> http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires >> >> openssl-beta-0.9.8a >> >> to be installed (I don't understand why). >> >> >> >> Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the >> >> stage >> >> of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up >> removing >> >> openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't >> >> remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with >> >> openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add >> >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp >> >> (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a >> >> newer >> >> openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye >> >> openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> >> only >> >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I >> overlook >> >> something? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ben >> >> Mike, >> Thanks for your answer. >> >> > You allready have the answer, you said it works when you build from >> > ports. If you don't want to always rebuild openoffice when you upgrade >> > ports mark it as ignored in pkgtools.conf. >> >> I already did - just because I don't want to compile OOo. Building OOo-2 >> on a PIII/1,13 isn't very funny. :-). OOo-1.1 was a little nightmare, >> especially because it took me a while to succeed - you'd surely find on >> google ;-). Last but not least, I don't have 9 free GBs. Really. :-) >> >> I just don't understand why the package I mentioned requires openssl, >> because I can't see any dependency on openssl, neither for building nor >> for running. >> >> >> A third way would be to use the ports openssl-beta as systems default? >> >> Ben >> >> > -Mike > > Your better off leaving openssl set to the one in base and building from > source anything that depends on openssl. The problem with packages is you > are at the mercy of how someone else built them. Mike, Yes, but this case is a little strange, isn't it? Nobody else is wondering, there actually is no dependency on openssl, using the ports openssl, even a beta may be a litte uncommon (?) and I think this URL I mentioned is the main source for getting OOo as a package. Despite the problem I face, thanks to Nakata Maho at this point for his work. > > I also don't see where the openssl dependency is comming from and have to > take your word for it the package of open office you tried had one. Short and clear ;-): root@trinity# pkg_add /data/software/freebsd/OOo_2.0m143_FreeBSD60Intel_install_de.tbz pkg_add: could not find package openssl-beta-0.9.8a ! > > If your installed open office was built by you and works I highly > recommend > you back it up, something like > > pkg_create -b /var/db/pkg/openoffice.org-2.0.0_1 and save the resulting > openoffice.org-2.0.0_1.tgz somewhere safe. Now if in the future yoy want > to upgrade it again from source and it doesn't work you always have a > known > good copy to fall back on. That sounds interesting. I never used pkg_create. Thanks for your hint, I'll have a look at this and look for a fast compiling machine :-)! Thanks for your response! Best, Ben > > -Mike > > > >