From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 28 13: 0:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6824937B440 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 13:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id NAA09185; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 13:00:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 13:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200008282000.NAA09185@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: ports/20902: Update port: math/physcalc Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/20902; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: tkato@prontomail.ne.jp Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/20902: Update port: math/physcalc Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:50:13 -0500 On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:49:23AM -0700, tkato@prontomail.ne.jp wrote: > >Synopsis: Update port: math/physcalc > >Description: > - Change procedure of converting return code > - Move build and install related things to FILESDIR/Makefile I'm sorry, but I see little point in this patch, other than making the \r\n -> \n conversion more efficient. I do not like the idea of spinning off the Makefile into another inode in the ports tree. And I think the perl regex for main() return is just fine, considering the unlikelihood of it ever failing its purpose. It makes the patches more manageable, more scalable. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message