Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 22:32:11 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: CFT/CFR: NUMA policy branch Message-ID: <559CB5DB.7040209@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20150707093747.GE2080@kib.kiev.ua> References: <CAJ-Vmo=SnqXTF5m65haKqrVf699zinyXs%2BQdvR6V88CW7vooCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonyTfSxj%2BD=FN3TUCO33w4vGqh1REQqx-8rd-JcArfqSA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=ON9bEngDoMFK-kJR=qVvcX%2BEeQXx%2BUoEsh1npMHjESQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150707093747.GE2080@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/7/15 2:37 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > I did not read further, the patch is half-done at best. This is unproductive. People are using Adrian's work and we plan on using it as well. FreeBSD is behind in the NUMA game by at least a decade Please describe in detail what the issues are, do not roadblock based on vagueshedding. JFYI: From http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxVersions -> 2.5.59 released Janury 17, 2003: NUMA aware scheduler extensions Let's move on and incrementally fix this as opposed to roadblocking. It's 13 years late. -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?559CB5DB.7040209>