From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 22 8:45:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from firehouse.net (spook.networkoperations.com [209.42.203.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3382F37B7AD for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 08:45:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from abc@firehouse.net) Received: (qmail 85943 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Apr 2000 15:45:16 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 11:45:16 -0400 From: Alan Clegg To: Andy Coates Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Processors Message-ID: <20000422114516.B85200@ecto.greenpeas.org> References: <017701bfac70$2152eaa0$0100a8c0@blade> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <017701bfac70$2152eaa0$0100a8c0@blade>; from andy@friends-tv.net on Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 04:33:34PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Out of the ether, Andy Coates spewed forth the following bitstream: > Would that be okay? And how can I test that I am using both processors? I > tried running a CPU intensive program and the load average never went over > 1, which I thought would reach 2 if 2 processors were in use. Try running two of your intensive programs and see what 'top' tells you. ie: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 17601 nobody 66 1 15728K 14260K CPU0 0 108.3H 98.10% 98.10% setiathome 17598 nobody 66 1 15148K 13748K RUN 1 108.3H 98.10% 98.10% setiathome AlanC -- \ Alan B. Clegg Just because I can \ abc@firehouse.net does not mean I will. \ \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message